SCI修改稿回答审稿人意见范文模板大全修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）ListofResponsesDearEditorsandReviewers:Thankyouforyourletterandforthereviewers’commentsconcerningourmanuscriptentitled“PaperTitle”(ID:文章稿号).Thosecommentsareallvaluableandveryhelpfulforrevisingandimprovingourpaper,aswellastheimportantguidingsignificancetoourresearches.Wehavestudiedcommentscarefullyandhavemadecorrectionwhichwehopemeetwithapproval.Revisedportionaremarkedinredinthepaper.Themaincorrectionsinthepaperandtherespondstothereviewer’scommentsareasflowing:Respondstothereviewer’scomments:Reviewer#1:1.Responsetocomment:(……简要列出意见……)Response:××××××2.Responsetocomment:(……简要列出意见……)Response:××××××。。。。。。逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用：Weareverysorryforournegligenceof……...Weareverysorryforourincorrectwriting……...ItisreallytrueasReviewersuggestedthat……WehavemadecorrectionaccordingtotheReviewer’scomments.Wehavere-writtenthispartaccordingtotheReviewer’ssuggestionAsReviewersuggestedthat……ConsideringtheReviewer’ssuggestion,wehave……最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：Specialthankstoyouforyourgoodcomments.Reviewer#2:同上述Reviewer#3:××××××Otherchanges:1.Line60-61,thestatementsof“……”werecorrectedas“…………”2.Line107,“……”wasadded3.Line129,“……”wasdeleted××××××Wetriedourbesttoimprovethemanuscriptandmadesomechangesinthemanuscript.Thesechangeswillnotinfluencethecontentandframeworkofthepaper.Andherewedidnotlistthechangesbutmarkedinredinrevisedpaper.WeappreciateforEditors/Reviewers’warmworkearnestly,andhopethatthecorrectionwillmeetwithapproval.Onceagain,thankyouverymuchforyourcommentsandsuggestions以下是审稿人意见和本人的回复。与大家分享。从中可以看出，这位审稿人认真读了文章，提出很多宝贵的意见。这些意见分布在文章的各个地方。我很诧异有人真正读了我的文章。看到这些意见，我觉得很感激，不是因为接收文章的原因，而是这些意见能真正有助于提高文章的质量。从中还看出，回答审稿人问题的“技巧”。对于回答问题，有的人就是一味反驳，却不加改进。记得ACSStyleGuide里面说，当审稿人问到问题的，哪怕是他理解错误，这也说明作者这么写，其他读者也会理解错误，引起歧义。因此，作者就是要修改句子，使表达不引起歧义。因此：有时间一味反驳，还不如指出具体改进在第几页、第几段。============================================Reviewers'comments:Reviewer#3:Whilerevisingthescript,itistobesuggestedthatauthorshouldclearlyindicatetheaim&scopeofthestudyandwhilemakingconclusion,itistobementionedhowthestudyisusefulforthepracticalpurposes.Inadditionthefollowingarethefewsuggestions/comments,whichmaybeincludedwhilerevision.1.Introductionpartfirstparalastline,authormustavoidtowriteambiguousstatementi.e.,muchworkisstillahead,mayindicateproperly.2.Authorcouldnotdemonstratethereasonwhy,toselecttheorganiccompoundsuchasethylpyruvateforthisstudy?3.Experimentalpart:Itisdifficulttounderstandthein-situRAIRSexperimentswithhomemadeliquid-solidRAIRScell.Moredetailedinformationmaybeusefulfortheothersthosewhoareworkinginthearea.Photographoftheassembledcellmaybeincluded.4.Thedescriptiongivenfortheexperimentalsetup(page4)canbepresentedbyflowdiagraminstead,asaneasetounderstandthesetup.5.ReslutsPart(Page6):"COadlayerswithidenticalmonolayercoverages",themonolayercoverage,isitbeenperformedwithsomeadsorptionmodel?Further,itwassuggestedthatCO-saturatedPtsurface,butno...
