QPAchecklistforsupplierqualificationVIP专享VIP免费

Evaluation Score Definition评分标准0 - no objective1 - written but not complete and / or known or understood2 - complete but no evidence that they have been communicated3 - complete and evidence that they have been communicated to all managers and engineers4 - complete and evidence that they are being continuously communicated to all employees1 Quality Management Policy & KPI质量管理政策&关键绩效指标法Comments1.1Does supplier define clear quality policy and R&R for quality management?供应商是否为质量管理制定明确的质量整理和R&R？1.2Is there any conflict at organization chart for quality management? 质量管理的组织结构图是否有冲突？1.3 Does supplier define KPI of quality goal? 供应商是否制定质量目标的关键绩效指标法？1.4Is this KPI deployed to each critical quality control point?关键绩效指标法是否部署到每个关键质量控制点？1.5Does supplier conduct systemic KPI review meeting and follow up the progress status?供应商是否实施体系化的有效绩效指标法评审会议并跟进进展情况？1.6Does supplier has the continuous quality improvement plan?供应商是否有持续的质量改进计划？2 Material Control 物料控制2.1Does supplier define the clear area for parts receiving, parts waiting for inspection, partsaccepted, parts rejected?供应商是否为零件来料、待检测零件、合格零件、不良零件定义明确的区域？2.2Does the material control e-system link with IQC sampling size, STD parts and FIFO?物料控制系统是否连接IQC抽样大小、STD零件和先出现出队列？2.3How often supplier update e-system inventory record once parts are accepted?当来料合格，供应商多久更新一次系统库存记录？2.4Is this system dynamic to reflect the actual inventory with productiion plan?是否有反映实际库存和生产计划的系统动态？2.5 Does supplier preapre safety stock?供应商是否准备安全库存？3 IQC3.1 Does supplier define clear procedure for IQC process?供应商是否为IQC制定明...