题目 ：狭窄性腱鞘炎微创治疗与传统手术治疗的统计学分析作者： 陈居文，硕士研究生，天津市第四中心医院骨二科，主要从事周围神经损伤的研究。Email： 。电话：0。通讯联系作者姓名及地址： 陈居文，天津市第四中心医院骨二科,天津市河北区中山路1 号，邮政编码： 300140。Email：狭窄性腱鞘炎微创治疗与传统手术治疗的统计学分析陈居文【摘要】目的 通过统计学分析对比两种治疗狭窄性腱鞘炎的手术方法。方法采用 微创手术治疗狭窄性腱鞘炎78例，采用传统手术方法治疗狭窄性腱鞘炎84 例，从临床治疗效果和发生的并发症两个方面对比两种手术方法。结果微创手术组治疗的有效率88.46%，传统手术组治疗的有效率94.04%，经过统计学分析P>0.05，尚不能认为两者有显著的差异。并发症方面比较， 微创手术组 并发症发生率为23.08%，传统手术组 并发症发生率为10.71%，统计学分析P<0.05，故可认为两者有显著的差异。结论微创手术治疗狭窄性腱鞘炎与传统的手术治疗效果没有差别，微创手术有其独特的优点，但是手术的并发症远高于传统的手术治疗，应严格地掌握手术的适应症，建议由有经验的手外科医生操作。【关键词】微创手术；传统手术；狭窄性腱鞘炎Statistics analyze treatment stenosing tenosynovitis between opening operation and micro trauma 【 Abstract 】Objective Compare with opening operation and micro trauma to treatment stenosing tenosynovitis by statistics analysis. MethodsTo treat stenosing tenosynovitis was 78 case by micro trauma and 84 case by opening operation . the curative effect and secondary of two operation was contrasted. ResultThe efficiency was 88.46% in the micro trauma and 94.04% in the opening operation. The value of the P beyond 0.05 by statistics analysis. The two operation couldn't be considered remarkable difference. The secondary was 23.08% in micro trauma operation and 10.71% in the opening operation. By statistics analysis, the value of the P below 0.05. The two operations were able to consider remarkable difference. ConclusionsThere was not different in the micro trauma operation and openi...
