摘 要迅速审判权在大多数国家和地区得到认可，从而在刑事立法，司法实践中予以规定，甚至将其上升为宪法层面予以保障，该项权利同时体现了实体正义和程序正义两个层面和维度，既保障了犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的合法权益，又为司法程序树立了公正和权威。在我国刑事立法中，刑事被追诉人的迅速审判权也没有明确规定，同时在刑事司法实践中，超期羁押、诉讼迟延、迟延审判频频出现，这使得被追诉人的合法正当权益受到损害，司法的公正性和权威性也受到挑战。为解决这些长期存在的问题，顺应世界人权发展潮流，与国际接轨，并引起我国法律界、法学界的对迅速审判权的重视，抛砖引玉，进一步制定和完善我国刑事立法和司法实践中一系列配套措施，实在必要对此相关问题进行探讨。同时近年来，我国不断加大对程序正义的重视和立法力度，逐渐改变以往过度强调实体正义，忽视程序正义的做法，对刑事诉讼程序进行相关制度改革，例如贯彻落实推进以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革、构建刑事速裁程序、进一步扩大简易程序的功能和适用范围、强调繁简分流的重要性等等，这都体现了我国对刑事诉讼程序理念的认识进一步成熟。但为了更好的贯彻落实这些理念，也有必要做进一步探讨和研究。关键词：刑事被追诉人 迅速审判权 程序正义 诉讼迟延AbstractJurisdiction over quickly recognized in most countries and regions, and in the criminal legislation, set forth in the judicial practice, and even its rise to the constitution guaranteed, the rights and at the same time embodies the two levels and dimensions of substantive justice and procedural justice, not only guarantee the legitimate rights and interests of criminal suspects and defendants, and for the judicial process to set up the justice and authority. In our country criminal activity legislation, quickly jurisdiction of criminal accused person also did not make clear a regulation, at the same time in the criminal judicial practice, trial detention, litigation delay, delay, which makes the criminal accused person's legitimate rights and interests are violated, the judicial impartiality and authority is challe...
