摘 要 长期以来，传统刑事司法制度是解决刑事纠纷的主要模式,甚至在一些国家是唯一模式，正是因为这种现象,传统刑事司法制度的弊端也日趋明显，从而滋生出了恢复性司法制度。注重“参加性"与“恢复性”是恢复性司法制度区别于传统刑事司法制度的特点.参加性要求在刑事解纷过程中被害人、加害人、社区成员多方参加，共同沟通。恢复性则要求帮助被害人从受犯罪影响的生活中恢复常态,同时鼓舞被告人积极承担责任，重新融入、回归社会,从而在被害人、加害人和社区之间重新建立和谐的社会关系。恢复性司法制度的诞生，对世界各国均产生了很大的冲击,我国也不例外，理论界与实践中正愈加体现恢复性司法制度的理念，譬如：刑事和解制度、社区矫正制度以少年法庭等等。基于恢复性司法制度的本质特点、国外的经验以及我国刑事司法中理论与实践中均存在的问题、弊端，本文以恢复性司法制度为对象,从理论与实践两方面展开分析,着重探讨了如何构建适合我国国情的恢复性司法制度。关键词：恢复性司法 理论基础 运作模式 构建AbstractFor a long time， the traditional criminal justice system is to solve the main mode of criminal disputes ， even in some countries is the only way is because of this phenomenon, the drawbacks of the traditional criminal justice system has become increasingly obvious ， thus breeding a restorative justice system 。 Focus on the ”participation characteristics” and ”recovery" is the restorative justice system is different from the traditional criminal justice system. Participation of the victim in the criminal dispute resolution process， the perpetrators， members of the community participation ， common exchange. Recovery requires help victims from the crime influence the life returned to normal, while encouraging the defendant actively take responsibility， reintegration， return to the society, and between the victim and the offender and community re establishment of harmonious social relations. Recovery of the birth of the judicial system and had a great impact on the res...
