中文摘要罪责刑相适应原则源于西方国家的“罪刑相当原则”和“责任主义”。我国在1997 年《刑法》中规定了罪责刑相适应原则，而该原则的司法实现一直是法律界一个争议的焦点。由于司法实践中常出现背离罪责刑相适应原则的现象，阻碍了定罪量刑的公正性与均衡性。本文通过对其他国家罪责刑相适应原则司法实现的对比讨论与借鉴，提出实现罪责刑相适应原则的建议。贯彻罪责刑相适应原则，有利于正确定罪量刑，有利于保护人权。关键词：罪责刑相适应原则；法定刑；定罪；量刑；自由裁量权 AbstractAdapt the principles of criminal culpability originated in Western Countries of ＂very principles of crime＂and ＂responsibility doctrine＂. The Criminal Law of China in 1997 embodies adapt the principles of criminal culpability. Judicial implementation of this principle is a argument focus of law all the times. It often occurs the phenomenon that adapt the principles of criminal culpability away from the judicial practice so that hindered conviction and sentencing of fairness and balance. This article comparative studies and references other countries’judicial implementation of adapt the principles of criminal culpability. And to raise some suggestions of realization of adapt the principles of criminal culpability. To make adapt the principles of criminal culpability really implement, it benefits conviction and sentencing, and human rights could be well protected in our country.Key words: adapt the principles of criminal culpability；sentence；conviction；sentencing；discretion试论我国罪责刑相适应原则的司法实现随着西方各种法学思潮的涌入，我国顺应世界刑事立法的趋势，在 1997 年《中华人民共和国刑法》（以下简称《刑法》）第 5 条中规定了：“刑罚的轻重，应当与犯罪分子所犯罪行和承担的刑事责任相适应”。法条的第 5 条明确了罪责刑相适应原则，但目前我们对该原则的理解还不透彻，导致司法实践中存在大量背离罪责刑相适应原则的现象。为了强化定罪量刑的司法公正，推动刑事司法民主化、法治化的进程，...
