目录引言..........................................................................................................1一、我国国家归责原则的概述...............................................................2（一）1995年国家赔偿法归责原则................................................2（二）2010年国家赔偿法归责原则................................................3二、现行国家赔偿法归责原则之缺陷...................................................4（一）归责原则体系性不足.............................................................61、现在世界各国盛行的归责原则有一下几类：......................6（二）不利于解决不作为的归责原则问题.....................................7（三）违法原则导致国家赔偿范围受限.........................................8（四）结果责任原则在使用上存在较大争议................................10三、域外归责原则的适用及启示.........................................................11（一）域外归责原则的适用...........................................................111、英国过失责任归责原则.......................................................112、美国双重过错归责原则.......................................................113、日本多元规则原则...............................................................11（二）域外归责的启示...................................................................121、过错责任原则为主，其他责任原则为辅的多元化归责原则体系.............................................................................................122、我国的归责原则要充分考虑本国国情................................12四、对我国国家赔偿归责原则完善的构想.........................................13（一）完善归责原则所应遵循的价值取向...................................13（二）违法责任原则的理解及适用...............................................13（三）过错责任原则的理解及适用...............................................14（四）结果责任原则的理解及适用...............................................14五、结语.................................................................................................15六、参考文献.........................................................................................15浅析我国国家赔偿归责原则之缺陷与完善摘要：我国国家赔偿制度的建立经历了很长的一段时间，起初是引用民法中的侵权责任归责原则，然后是1995年的违法责任归责原则，一直到今天的违法责任为主，结果责任为辅的二元化归责体系。但是，此种归责方式仍然存在很大的缺陷，违法归责原则本身的弊端，国家赔偿范围的限缩都使受害公民的利益无法得到有效维护。因此，结果我国国家赔偿归责原则的缺陷并使其得到完善是重中之重。关键词：国家赔偿；归责原则；缺陷与完善；过错责任原则；违法责任原则OntheprincipleofStateCompensationLiabilityDefectsandPerfectionByAbstract:Establishmentofanationalcompensationsysteminourcountryhasexperiencedalongperiodoftime,initiallycitedCivilLawCivilTortLiability,thenthe1995Liabilitylawprinciples,hastheresponsibilitytotoday'slaw-based,supplementedbytheresultsofresponsibilitiesthedualityimputationsystem.However,thisimputationmethodisstillalotofdeficiencies,thedrawbacksofLiabilityprincipleitself,narrowsthescopeofstatecompensationaresoaggrievedcitizeninterestscannotbeeffectivelymaintained.Therefore,theresultsoftheStateCompensationLiabilityPrincipledefectsandmakeitatopprioritytogetperfect.Keywords:Statecompensation;imputativeprinciple;FaultimputationprincipleIllegalimputativeprinciple;Resu...
