外研社杯辩论赛辩题分析VIP免费

THWcreateandenforcefilialresponsibilitylaws.2017-12-22思辨精英平台THWcreateandenforcefilialresponsibilitylaws.·ProblemsExistingintheStatusQuo·-Proposition-1.OnechildpolicyinChinamakesparentsputalotofeffortsuponchildren,butchildrendon’tpaybackcorrespondingly,thusalotofparentsarebeingleftover.2.Lackofwell-establishednursinghousesfortheelderlyinthesociety.3.Parentshavestereotypicalideatowardsnursinghousesandahighexpectationontheirchildren,thustheyarenotwillingtogothere.-Opposition-1.Childrenliveinfamilieswhicharerandomlydeterminedbybirthlottery,someofthemevenliveinacoercivefamilycondition.2.Familyemotionalbondisenough,thereisnonecessityforthispolicy,thusgovernmentsidedoesn’thavetogothatfarbymakingitintoalaw.·Possiblemodel·MakefilialresponsibilitylawsaCivillaw,oncechildrenviolated,theywouldbesuedandfined,themonetaryresponsibilityrequiresthemoneytheygivetheirparentsshouldbeproportionatetothesalaryorthemoneytheirparentshavespentonthembefore;thecaringresponsibilityrequiresanationalizedquotaaboutthetimechildrenshouldspendwiththeirparents.·Argumentsforproposition·1.Havingchildrenwillcostalotforparents,thuschildrenshouldshoulderresponsibilityafterwardsandthelawenforcementisreasonable:raisingchildrenrequiresparentstotakethemasuppermostpriority,thentheywillsacrificealotofopportunities,makesthemlesscompetitiveanddetertheirself-actualizationprocess,andalsoconsideringthehugeexpendituretheyspendwhenraisetheirchildren,itislegitimatetohavealawtoprotectparentswhentheyareinvulnerablepositions.2.Havingchildrenmakesthegenderroleprobleminthesocietyevenmoreseverethuschildrenshouldcompensateforthat:havingchildrenmeansfemaleshavetosuffermorediscriminationoutofmaternalleave,andmalesmustshouldermoreresponsibility,expectationandpressurefromsociety.3.Thispolicywillpromotepositivediscourseinpublic,letchildrenreconsidertheirroleandrealizetheignorancetheyhavetowardsparents,influencethechildrenwhoaren’twillingtotakecareoftheirparentsinprevioustime,spendmoretimewiththeirparents.Positivediscoursewillsetafriendlyenvironment,andincreasethepossibilityfororganicchangetohappen.·Argumentforopposition·1.Rebuttal:Theproblemsidentifiedbypropositionsidearenotcausedbychildren’sbehaviorbutthesocialnarrative,whichgovernmentshouldcontrolbyguidingpoliciesbutratherhavingchildrentobeartheburden.2.Childrenliveinfamilieswhicharerandomlydeterminedbybirthlottery,theydon’thavetopayforthesearbitrarycoincidences,andsomeofthemevenliveinacoercivefamilycondition,thuschildrenshouldatleasthaveachancetomakeanindependentdecisionaboutwhethertobreakupfromthatparticularfamilywhichtrapsthem.3.Coercingunwillingkidswillmakethefamilysituationevenworse:oncetheirtimeandmoneyisdeprived,childrenmightblameallthatfortheirparents,whichwillweakenthealreadydelicatefamilybond.4.Thispolicywillbeanexcuseforgovernmenttododgeandavoidsocialresponsibility:oncegovernment’sresponsibilitytoprovidebettersocialwelfaretowardselderlyhaselsewheretotransfer,theywillhavelessincentivetodeveloptheinfrastructurewhichtheyoughttohave.5.Invokeanegativesocialnarrativethathavingchildrenisafinancialinvestment:thementalityofraisingkidschangedfromemotionalbondtofinancialinvestment,parentsmighttreattheirkidslikeatoolorlotteryonlytoguaranteetheirlife,theywanttohavemorebabiestoincreasethepossibilitytohavemoresuccessfulkidswhocansupportthemafterwards,ortheywouldpushver...