目录......................................1.......................................................................................2......................................3.........................................................4....................................................................................4............................................................................4............................................................................4....................................................................................5..............................................5.........................................................5................................................................5.........................................................6................................................................6.................................................6.............................................................6.............................................................6................................................................7.........................................................8......................................8...............................9................................................................91..............................................................10..............................................................10.....................................................................................11.............................................................................11网络言论的自由界限及其规制引导摘要言论自由是公民的基本权利，但由于现实生活各种因素的影响，往往不能真正实现。网络言论因其匿名、简便即时、开放平等的特点，使网民真正实现了言论自由，具有相当的积极意义，但是同时也出现了许多的社会问题。这些问题的原因是多方面的，除了网络言论自身的特点外，我国立法对于网络言论自由界限的规定模糊、网络监管不到位、部分网民责任感缺失也加剧了这些问题。仅靠网络自身的调节来解决这些问题已经捉襟见肘，所以还需要公权力的介入，完善立法、加强法律之间的协调配合，可以推行类似于交规中的扣分制以及网络后台实名制；同时网络平台方以及国家网络监管机构要加强监管，完善投诉举2报机制，同时必须加强对公民个人信息的保护；此外，还需要提高网民的素质，加强法律法规的学习，不仅要做到自己合法文明发表网络言论，还要积极勇于和失范言论作斗争。对于网络言论，我们要坚持以保护和引导为主，以惩罚为辅的策略，既要保障网民的网络言论自由，又要努力解决存在的问题。关键词网络言论自由；言论失范；规制；引导NetworkFreedomofSpeechLimitsandRegulatoryGuidanceAbstractFreedomofexpressionisthebasicrightsofcitizens,butbecauseoftheinfluenceofvariousfactors,citizenscannotreallyenjoythefreedomofspeechinreallife.ThespeechintheInternetbecauseofitssimple,anonymousinstant,equalandopenfeatures,usersachieverealfreedomofspeechontheInternet,hasgreatsocialsignificance,buttherearealsomany3socialproblems.Therearemanyreasonsfortheseproblems,inadditiontoitsowncharacteristicsofspeechontheInternet,China'slegislativeprovisionsonthefreedomofspeechontheInternet,theambiguitybetweennetworksupervisionisnotinplace,andlackofsenseofresponsibilityofsomeusersalsoexacerbatedtheseproblems.Relyingonthenetworkownadjustmenttosolvetheseproblemshasbeenstretched,soitneedstheinterventionofpublicpower,perfectthelegislation,strengthenthecoordinationbetweenthelaw,canbeimplementedsimilartotherulesofdeduct...
