新产品制造方法专利侵权案例评析VIP专享

1新产品制造方法专利侵权案例评析——以张喜田诉欧意公司等方法专利侵权案为例摘要本文以新产品制造方法专利侵权判定为研究主题，自《最高人民法院关于审理侵犯专利权纠纷案件应用法律若干问题的解释》发布后，张喜田诉欧意公司等专利侵权案成为第一起由最高人民法院审理的案例。该案引起学界与实务界对新专利司法解释第十七条、专利法第五十七条第二款以及第六十一条第一款的热切讨论。笔者通过研读该案裁判细节，将对如何选定“新产品”与“同种产品”的标准、方法专利的延伸保护范围怎样扩定以及举证责任倒置应如何适用等问题一一予以分析，以期为完善方法专利侵权判定的理论提供一些思路，为实务界疑难问题的解决作出一些贡献。关键字：方法专利；新产品；延伸保护；举证责任Abstract since the "interpretation of the supreme people's court on several issues concerning the application of law in the trial of patent infringement disputes" was issued, the patent infringement case such as zhang xitian v. ouyi company became the first case to be tried by the supreme people's court.This case has aroused a heated discussion in the academic and practical circles on article 17 of the new patent judicial interpretation, article 57, paragraph 2, and article 61, paragraph 1 of the patent law.By studying the details of the judgment in this case, the author will discuss how to select the standard of "new product" and "same product", how to expand the protection scope of method patent and how to apply the inversion of burden of proof.In order to provide reference for the theory and practice of the determination of patent infringement.Key words: method patent;New products;Extended protection;The burden of proof2目录一、张喜田诉欧意公司等方法专利侵权案................................4（一）案情简介......................................................4（二）法院判决......................................................41.一审判决结果及审理依据............................................42...