《基督山恩仇记》与《琅琊榜》中复仇形象之比较摘要 对《基督山恩仇记》和《琅琊榜》中复仇形象的比较，从复仇主体的动机、复仇表现以及复仇结局入手，探究中西文化的差异以及文本的深层内涵。在复仇动机上，唐泰斯为维护自我人格尊严，梅长苏为捍卫集体荣誉利益。但从根本而言，两人都是对黑暗政治的反抗和对公平正义的追求；复仇表现中，唐泰斯以金钱和法律为媒介，对仇人实施精准对等的复仇形式，梅长苏则以皇权和人才为媒介，表现为扩大化的复仇形式；复仇结局中，从表层上看，唐泰斯和梅长苏都对仇人选择了宽恕，且两书围绕复仇主体内心的冲突矛盾和人物结局，表现出对仇恨的思考和对救赎的肯定。但从深层来说 ，唐泰斯复仇不彻底性的根源来自基督教的宽恕理念，梅长苏则源于儒家的君臣伦理观。关键词 《基督山恩仇记》 《琅琊榜》 复仇形象 异同A Comparison Between the Revenge Characters in Nirvana in Fire and The Mountain of ChristAbstract The comparison of the revenge images in The Mountain of Christ and Nirvana in fire explores the differences between Chinese and Western cultures and the deep connotation of the texts from the motives of the revenge subjects, the revenge performance and the revenge ending. In the motive of revenge, Dontes in order to maintain self-dignity, Mei chang-su in order to defend the collective honor interests. But in essence, both men were revolts against the dark politics and in pursuit of justice and fairness. In the performance of revenge, Dontes used money and law as the media to exact an equal form of revenge against his enemies, Mei chang-su took imperial power and talented person as the medium, displays for the expansion revenge form. In the revenge ending, Dontes and Mei chang-su both choose to forgive the enemy, and the two books focus on the inner conflicts and the characters'ending of the revenge subject, showing the thinking of hatred and the affirmation of redemption. However, in a deep sense,...
