电脑桌面
添加小米粒文库到电脑桌面
安装后可以在桌面快捷访问

中美司法法律制度比较精选文档VIP免费

中美司法法律制度比较精选文档_第1页
1/13
中美司法法律制度比较精选文档_第2页
2/13
中美司法法律制度比较精选文档_第3页
3/13
AComparisonofJudicatureAndlegalSystembetweenChinaandUSChinaandtheUnitedStatesaretwomainpowerfulcountiesineconomicandmilitaryfieldsintheworld。Nevertheless,inthepoliticalsystemandsocialandculturalaspects,therearemanycrucialdifferencesbetweenthem。Thesedifferencesaretooexcessivetootremendousandtoodeep-going,asaresult,thetwocountiesdivergemarkedlywhenitcomestoalmosteveryinternationalaffair。Wedon’thavethatwisdomandstrengthofresearchingandprobingthosedifferences.Thatbeingso,let’sgiveitaheadstartinthejudicialsystemandlaw。JudicialsystemJudicialsystemofUSistotallydifferentfromours。Firstly,America’sjudiciaryisonebranchofthatthreebranches—thelegislativebranch,theexecutivebranchandthejudicialbranch.Thosethreebranchesdividenationalgovernment’spowerintothree。ThisdivisionofauthorityisknownasasystemofchecksandbalancesestablishedbytheConstitution,whichismeanttopreventanyofthethreebranchesfromhavingtoomuchpower。Eachbranchhascertaincontrolsovertheotherbranches.Eachbranchcanlimittheotherbranchesfromgainingtoomuchpower.Inotherwords,eachbranchofthethreebranchesisequaltoeachother.It’simpossibletoletonebedominatedbyanother.SoCourtsinAmericadon’tcareaboutwhattheadministratorsthink.TheyjustmaketheverdictaccordingtotheConstitutionandlawandonthebasisofevidence。ButinChina,thecaseiscompletelydifferent。Inversely,Chinagovernmentpursuesthecentralizationpoliticalsystemratherthanthetripartitepoliticalsystemofchecksandbalances。JudicialsysteminChinaisnotapartyofchecksandbalances,notatall.Moreimportantly,inordertosegmentandweakenjudiciary'spower,statusandweight,thejudicialsystemitselfhasbeendividedintomanybranches,mainlytheCourtandProcuratorate.CourtsinChinaisjustalittledepartmentinnationalpoliticalsystem,whichcanbecontrolledandimpactedbymanyothergovernment'sbranches,forexample,NationalPeople'sCongressStandingCommittee,OfficeofLegislativeAffairs,judicialbureauandLawCouncilofvariouslevelsCPCCommitteeandsoon。Tosomedegree,China’sjudiciaryisjustamouthpiece。Lawsarejustreference.Leader’swritteninstructionorcommentsarerealandpotentialcriterion.SowecanseethatthestatusandimportanceofjudicialsysteminAmericaarehigherandmoresignificantthanitinChina.What’smore,America’sjudicialsystemisindependentandself—governed,butamightyandindependentjudicialsystemcan’tbefoundinChina.Acase’saffirmationandverdicthavetobedirectedandinterferedbymanyindividualsandorganizationsinChina。Forinstance,ifagovernment’sleaderorofficialbreaksthelawandcommits,thejudicialdepartmentcan’tacceptthelawsuitandenquirehimatonce,beforetheCDIC(CommissionforDisciplineInspectionoftheCPC)investigatehisbehaviorandmakedecisionthatwhetherheshouldbepushedintothejudicialsystem。Iftheoffenderisadepartmentalorhigherlevelcadre,reviewinghimhavetobeapprovedandratifiedbythecentralcommitteeoftheCommunistPartyofChina.Thatistosay,ifaleaderorofficialkilledhundredsofpeople,rapedhundredsmaidensandcorruptedhundredsmillions,thecourtscan’tdoanythingtohimbeforetheCDICconfirmshisatrocitiesandcrimeseventhoughvictimshaveprosecutedhimthousandstimes.Thusitcanbeseenthatinourcountry,thereexistsanorganizationwhichhasmuchmorepowerandmuchhigherstatusthananyotherorganizations。Beforeitsrules,thelawsarehumble,faintandimpotent。So,whydosomanyunjustandunequaleventstakeplacepervasivelyandconstantly?Whydosomanyinnocentpersonshavebeenextortedconfessi...

1、当您付费下载文档后,您只拥有了使用权限,并不意味着购买了版权,文档只能用于自身使用,不得用于其他商业用途(如 [转卖]进行直接盈利或[编辑后售卖]进行间接盈利)。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。
3、如文档内容存在违规,或者侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权等,请点击“违规举报”。

碎片内容

中美司法法律制度比较精选文档

确认删除?
VIP
微信客服
  • 扫码咨询
会员Q群
  • 会员专属群点击这里加入QQ群
客服邮箱
回到顶部