I论文题目：羁押必要性审查制度研究中文摘要人权保障是刑事诉讼的核心词，也是我国刑事诉讼法的基本理念和价值追求之一。但在司法实践中，构罪即捕、超期羁押、变现羁押等问题屡禁不止，而我国关于羁押必要性审查制度的法律规定也一直处于空白状态，直到2012年，在新修订的《刑事诉讼法》中，以第93条：“犯罪嫌疑人、被告人被逮捕后，人民检察院仍应当对羁押的必要性进行审查。对不需要羁押的，应当建议予以释放或者变更强制措施。有关机关应该在十日以内将处理情况通知人民检察院。”确立了羁押必要性审查制度，此后在《高检规则》、《人民检察院办理羁押必要性审查案件规定（试行）》中对此项制度进行了细化，使其更具有可操作性。然而，此项制度的施行依旧存在着许多难题，为此，本文意在通过借鉴域外代表性国家相对成熟的羁押必要性审查制度，结合我国施行羁押必要性审查制度的现状，其存在着依申请启动较少、审查方式封闭、审查标准不一、审查后建议效力不足、替代性措施不完善、缺乏权利救济途径等问题，对羁押必要性审查制度进行研究，并提出相关改进的设想：完善配套机制、探索公开听证的方式、统一审查标准、加大说理力度、完善替代性措施、完善救济途径等等。关键词：羁押，羁押必要性审查，人权保障IIABSTRACTHumanrightsprotectionisthecorewordofcriminallawsuit,anditisalsooneofthebasicconceptsandvaluepursuitsofChina'scriminalprocedurallaw.However,injudicialpractice,problemssuchasconviction,arrest,overduedetention,andliquidationofcustodyhavecontinuedformanyyears.However,China’slegalprovisionsoncustodialnecessityreviewhavealsobeenleftblankuntil2012whenthenewlyrevised“CriminalProcedureLaw”wasintroduced.Inarticle93,"Afterthecriminalsuspectordefendantisarrested,thePeople'sProcuratorateshallstillexaminethenecessityofdetention.Ifnodetentionisrequired,itshallbeproposedtoreleaseorchangethecompulsorymeasure.TherelevantorganshallThePeople'sProcuratoratewillbenotifiedofthesituationwithin10days."Thecustodialnecessityreviewsystemhasbeenestablished.Sincethen,thesystemhasbeenrefinedinthe"HigherInspectionRules"and"People'sProcuratorate'sRegulationsontheNecessityofCustodyReview(Trial)".Tomakeitmoremaneuverable.However,therearestillmanydifficultiesintheimplementationofthissystem.Forthisreason,thepurposeofthispaperistousethereferencetotherelativelymaturecustodynecessityreviewsystemoftherepresentativecountriesintheextraterritorialarea,inconjunctionwiththestatusquooftheimplementationofcustodynecessityreviewsysteminChina.Problemssuchaslessstart-up,closedexaminationmethods,differentreviewstandards,lackofeffectivenessafterreview,imperfectalternativemeasures,andlackofrightsremedymethodswerestudied.Thereviewofcustodialnecessityreviewwasconducted,andsuggestionsforimprovement:Improvesupportingmechanisms,explorewaysofpublichearings,unifyreviewstandards,increaserationality,improvealternativemeasures,andimproveremedies.KEYWORDS：Custody,thenecessityofcustody,humanrightsprotection.III目录一、我国羁押必要性审查的性质及制度价值......................................1（一）我国羁押必要性审查的性质..................................1（二）我国羁押必要性审查制度的价值..............................2二、我国羁押必要性审查制度存在的问题........................................3（一）依申请启动数量少..........................................3（二）审查方式封闭..............................................3（三）审查的标准不一............................................4（四）变更、解除羁押措施建议效力不足............................4（五）解除羁押后的替代性措施不完善，变更措施存在风险.............
