电脑桌面
添加小米粒文库到电脑桌面
安装后可以在桌面快捷访问

GRE满分“魔板”——中间段

GRE满分“魔板”——中间段_第1页
1/9
GRE满分“魔板”——中间段_第2页
2/9
GRE满分“魔板”——中间段_第3页
3/9
GRE 满分“魔板”——中间段 GRE 总分 作文"魔板'开头段 GRE 总分 作文"魔板'结尾段 中间段作为文章的主体部分作用不容小觑。思想的陈述是很重要的,若能辅以恰当的格式,则更为锦上添花了。以下是我整理的5 个 GRE 作文中间段模板,大家不妨参照一下。 模板一 First, the argument is based on a false analogy. The arguer simply assumes that airplane mechanics and automobile maintenance crews perform many similar functions, but he does not provide any evidence that their functions are indeed comparable. As we know, the structure, operation and function of airplanes and those of automobiles differ conspicuously. It is true that both the airplane and the automobile need refueling and engine maintenance, but even here there exist fundamental differences: the structure and the building materials of each others engines are different, so is the oil they use. Therefore, even though the two-week Quality-Care Seminar proved effective in improving the performance of the maintenance crews in the automobile racing industry, there is no guarantee that it will work just as well for airplane mechanics. Second, the arguer commits a fallacy of hasty generalization. Even if the maintenance of the airline has been improved as a result of sending its mechanics to the Seminar, which is, of course , unwarranted assumption, it does not follow that there will be greater profits as well as greater customer satisfaction for airline. As we know, customer satisfaction depends on several major factors other than good maintenance of the airplane. For instance, customers are generally concerned about the punctuality, the on-board service, the ticket price, the luggage handling procedure and even the discount, all of which are ignored by the arguer. Besides, the arguer does...

1、当您付费下载文档后,您只拥有了使用权限,并不意味着购买了版权,文档只能用于自身使用,不得用于其他商业用途(如 [转卖]进行直接盈利或[编辑后售卖]进行间接盈利)。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。
3、如文档内容存在违规,或者侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权等,请点击“违规举报”。

碎片内容

GRE满分“魔板”——中间段

确认删除?
VIP
微信客服
  • 扫码咨询
会员Q群
  • 会员专属群点击这里加入QQ群
客服邮箱
回到顶部