摘 要本文主题是信用证第三人欺诈中受益人法律责任的认定，即受益人所提交单据的真实性构成了客观上的信用证欺诈，其中第三方参与了欺诈行为的实施。首先，本文通过对上位概念的定义以及新标准的确立就“信用证第三人欺诈”这一新概念进行阐释，并根据欺诈主体的数量将其分类为受益人和第三人共同实施和第三人单独实施两类。其次，本文分析了在信用证第三人欺诈中追究受益人法律责任的法理基础和实践需要，为其立法和司法寻求正当性基础。再次，本文介绍了我国在信用证欺诈纠纷处理领域主要借鉴的英美法系的较有经验的国家的做法，整理了我国在此方面的立法和司法实践，并将外国经验积累与我国实践相结合找出了我国信用证第三人欺诈纠纷处理总体标准不确定、严格双重标准以及与法律统一性等问题。最后，本文就两种信用证第三人欺诈类型分别分析其应然认定准则，并就达成此目标在立法、司法和法官认知等方面提出初步建议。- I -关键词： 信用证欺诈例外原则，第三人欺诈，受益人法律责任On the Determination of the Legal Responsibility for the Beneficiary in Fraud of Letter of Credit including a Third PartyAbstractThe subject of this article is on the determination of the legal responsibility for the beneficiary in fraud of the letter of credit including a third-party. It constitutes a letter of credit fraud objectively that the authenticity of the documents submitted by the beneficiary , in which a third party participates in the implementation of fraud. First of all, this article explains the new concept of “Letter of Credit Third Party Fraud” through the definition of higher-level concepts and the choice of new standards. By then there are two categories classified by the number of fraud subjects, both beneficiaries and third parties doing the fraud and only the third party. Secondly, in order to seek a legitimate basis for its legislation and legal practice, this article analyzes the legal basis and practical needs of pursuing the legal responsibility of the beneficiary in...
