摘要企业并购会计问题一直以来都是会计理论界和实务界所共同关注的问题，同时也是争议不断的会计领域。其中，企业并购的会计政策选择一直是争议的焦点，选择不同的并购会计政策会导致不同的会计后果以致不同的经济后果，甚至会影响到企业并购的顺利进行。20 年代 90 年代那场全球合并浪潮背景下，美国、英国等发达国家为了更好的反映经济行为的实质，为信息使用者提供高质量的会计信息，进而促进证券市场上资源的有效配置，取消了权益结合法。与我国颁布的企业合并准则允许权益结合法和购买法共存的二元制局面形成鲜亮对比。本文从企业合并出发，详细分析企业合并的两种主要会计处理方法---购买法和权益结合法的特别与二者的比较，总结出两种方法的优缺点。并由此对我国颁布的企业合并准则允许权益结合法存在的合理性进行分析，最后提出建议和对策，以期有利于准则的进展和完善。AbstractEnterprise merger accounting problems have been accounting theory and practice for the common concerns, but also dispute continuously accounting field. Among them, the enterprise merger accounting policy choice has been controversial, the choice of accounting policy merger will result in different accounting consequences so that differenteconomic consequences, or even affect the enterprise merger smoothly. In the 20 s in the 90 s under the background of the global merger wave, the United States, Britain and other developed countries in order to better reflect the essence of economic behavior, for information the user with the quality of accounting information, and promote the securities market resources effectively configuration, cancel the combination with rights. And our country issued enterprise merger standards allow rights purchase method of combination and coexist binary system a stark contrast to the situation.This paper starting from the merger of enterprise, detailed analysis enterprise merger of two major accounting treatment- -the purchase method and the rights and interests o...
