1]一次评估 评估项 项目区位地段周边交通条件周边社区环境教育与生活便利度整体规划与建筑设计园林景观环境内部基础设施物业管理市场营销与经营水平开发理念与文化底蕴合计合意度指数Μ1μ2μ3μ4μ5μ6μ7μ8μ9μ10μ 合本案项目6.757.3756.8757.758.758.6258.18.1258.88.77579.875阳光花园7.4257.6257.3757.9258.959.1258.4258.68.4758.37582.3南园(泰苑)7.47.6257.0257.6757.97.77.8757.657.57.57575.925听涛雅苑6.8757.3756.8757.857.057.1256.9257.27.87.5572.625锦园二期7.27.67.08.258.057.9257.457.97.8257.7576.95天成园林聚8.357.657.757.7757.6757.47.357.47.257.2568.45银海雅苑7.97.858.257.98.78.0257.98.58.5258.67582.225万兴花园7.97.858.1257.6256.6256.757.157.16.8757.0573.05金沙小区6.256.9756.8758.2757.3757.7257.9257.8757.657.67575.05物业外部生态需求指数 Z1物业内部生态需求指数 Z2物业价值感评价指数 Z3 Z3物业区位地段评价周边交通条件评价周边社区环境评价周边教育与生活便利度评价物业整体规划及建筑设计评价物业园林景观环境评价物业内部基础配套设施评价物业管理水平评价市场营销策划与经营管理水平评价物业开发理念与文化底蕴评价 目标地产市场营销合意度综合评价指数 H目标物业品质综合评价指数 P.5.5 +.25.6 +.75.6 +.4 +.4.6.4 + +.75555.25.3.7.45555.55555.5.5 + + + ++µ1µ2µ3µ4µ5µ6µ7µ8µ9µ10西亚山庄5.455.55.6258.2756.7758.46.557.557.57.5569.175金石小区江南水乡7.1257.4757.1758.157.9757.27.0757.757.5257.37567.075北京路花园8.1258.2258.0757.356.9757.5257.3757.57.57.42576.075东方玫瑰园8.238.167.97.28.47.757.157.57.357.5577.19博园世家8.6258.257.97.1258.37.957.7257.4757.77.978.95北莲华庭7.257.5257.07.257.156.256.57.07.757.82571.5世纪生活7.557.5257.58.3258.0258.07.4257.8258.3258.3578.85千禧龙庭7.357.557.47.958.07.5257.657.857.77.876.775景秀庄园7.57.5757.3257.757.3757.5257.4257.5257.4757.7575.225注：所有楼盘假如建筑质量评价为零，整体合意度为零本 案 项 目W（I-1）=6.75 ×0.5+7.375 ×0.5=7.0625W=（I-2）=8.75 ×0.55+8.625 ×0.45=8.69375Z3=W（I-3）=8.8 ×0.45+8.775 ×0.55=8.78625W（Ⅱ-1）=7.0625 ×0.6+6.875 ×0.4=6.9875W（Ⅱ-2）=8.69375 ×0.75+8.1 ×0.25=8.5453125Z1= W（Ⅲ-1）=6.9875 ×0.75+...
