腹股沟无张力疝修补术-无张力疝修补术在腹股沟复发疝治疗中的效果评价

下载后可任意编辑腹股沟无张力疝修补术_无张力疝修补术在腹股沟复发疝治疗中的效果评价腹股沟无张力疝修补术_无张力疝修补术在腹股沟复发疝治疗中的效果评价 【摘要】 目的: 探讨无张力疝修补术在腹股沟复发疝治疗中的的临床效果。方法:将 68 例腹沟股复发疝患者采纳随机数字的方法，分为开放式无张力疝修补术组（A 组）与腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术（B 组），各组均 34 例。比较两组患者平均手术时间，首次下床活动时间，平均住院时间，住院费用及术后并发症的发生情况。结果：B 组患者平均手术时间，首次下床活动时间及平均住院时间均显著少于 A 组（P0.05）。结论：开放式无张力疝修补术与腹腔镜疝修补术治疗腹沟股复发疝均安全有效，有各自的优势，同时又各有缺点，临床医生应根据患者的具体病情、对手术质量要求及经济承受力等多方面进行综合考虑而选择合适的手术方式。 【关键词】 腹股沟复发疝；开放式无张力疝修补；腹腔镜疝修补术；效果评价 The Tension-free inguinal hernia repair in the treatment of recurrent hernia Evaluation YangXiang (Department of General Surgery ,the People"s Hospital of Dujiangyan City, Chengdu, Dujiangyan xxxx) 【Abstract】 Objective: To investigate the tension-free inguinal hernia repair in the treatment of recurrent hernia clinical results. Methods: 68 patients with recurrent abdominal hernia patients ditch shares the method using random numbers, into open tension-free hernia repair group (A) and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (B group), all groups were 34 cases. Compared two groups of patients with an average operative time, get out of bed the first time, the average 1下载后可任意编辑length of stay, hospital costs and postoperative complications were observed. Results: B group with an average operative time, get out of bed the first time and the average length of stay were significantly less than group A (P 0.05). Conclusion: Open tension-free hernia repair and laparoscopic hernia repair, treatment of abdominal hernia recurrence ditch ...