南海仲裁案之研究摘要菲律宾于 2013 年 1 月 22 日悍然漠视中国的反对，一意孤行的向国际海洋法法庭就南海争端提交强制仲裁程序。2016 年 7 月 12日，菲律宾南海仲裁案的国际海洋法法庭仲裁庭作出最终裁决。对此，菲律宾声称其将争端提交仲裁的依据是《联合国海洋法公约》附件七项下的强制仲裁程序，该程序让人引发深思。对于解决国家间关于海洋划界和岛屿主权的的争端是否能够适用呢？对此，国际海洋法法庭能不能够进行管辖呢？我国立场与应对方式是否符合程序？面对白热化的紧张的南海形势，我国应该提出什么样具体的应对策略，均是须要予以考量的。 关键词：南海争端；海洋法公约；国际仲裁A Study on Arbitration in South China SeaAbstractThe Philippines, on 22 January 2013, disregarded China's opposition and offered to submit to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea a compulsory arbitration procedure on the South China Sea dispute. On 12 July 2016, the Court of Arbitration of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in the South China Sea Arbitration case made a final decision. In this regard, the Philippines claims that its submission of the dispute to arbitration is based on the compulsory arbitration procedure under Annex VII to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which is a reflection. Is it possible to address the dispute between States on maritime delimitation and island sovereignty? Does the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea have jurisdiction over it? Does my position and coping style conform to the procedure? Facing the intense situation of the South China Sea, China should put forward what kind of specific coping strategies, are need to be considered.Keywords: South China Sea dispute; Convention on the Law of the Sea; International Arbitration诚信承诺书目录一、 中非南海争端仲裁案始末................................................................................
