2024 考研英语阅读高分之段落推理题 其实，不尽然。段落推理题的题目很容易识别，常用的命题形式有：What can we infer from the first paragraph? (从第一段中我们能推出什么?)首先明确考研中根本就没有所谓的推理，推理题的做法和细节题的做法是一致的，只是这样设置题干可以扩大命题控制的区域，一个题目在某些情况下甚至相当于四个细节题，早年还有更为无耻的命题方式：What can be inferred from the passage? 这样命题其实就是出题人希望 试 题 涵 盖 更 多 的 测 试 点 ， 对 考 生 来 讲 最 大 的 障 碍 就 是timeconsuming(耗时)，考生假如每个选项认真和原文比对应该不难找出答案，哪怕费时略微多一些。但是有的时候我们却遇到出题人为我们设置的另外一个困境：选项和原文比对时，我们很难排除。先看一个例题: 2024 年 Text 4 最后一题： It can be inferred from Paragraph 5 that___________. [A] data leakage is more severe in Europe [B] FTC’s decision is essential to data security [C] California takes the lead in security legislation(D) [D] legal penalty is a major solution to data leakage 原文根据： 1.The current state of affaires may have been encouraged—though not justified—by the lack of legal penalty (in America, but not Europe) for data leakage. 2.Until California recently passed a law, American firms did not have to tell anyone, even the victim, when data went astray. 3. That may change fast: lots of proposed datasecurity legislation is now doing the rounds in Washington, D.C. 4.Meanwhile, the theft of information about some 40 million creditcard accounts in America, disclosed on June 17th, overshadowed a hugely important decision a day earlier by America’s Federal Trade Commission (FTC) that puts corporate America on notice that regulators will act if firms fail to provide adequate data security. 参考译文： 1.尽管还没有得到证实，但目前这类事件的发生很有可能是因为还没有相关法律对信息泄漏做出处罚(在美国，不...
