Module5CloningPartOne:TeachingDesign第一部分教学设计Period4:SpeakingandwritingGoalsTolearntoreadandwriteaboutcloningProcedures▇ReadingaboutargumentsagainstcloningHello,class.Areyoufororagainstcloning?Let'slookattheargumentsgenerallyofferedagainstcloning.Ibelievetheycanbefairlysummarizedasfollows:●Cloneswillbegrowntoproduce"spareparts"forotherpeople,ortobeusedformedicalresearch.Thus,clones--whowillbe,ofcourse,humanbeings--willbetreatedasdisposableproperty,withfewerrightsthananyslave,bredandkilledforthebenefitofothers.●Bymakingacopyofaperson,cloningrobspeopleoftheirindividuality.●Bycreatingapersonthroughanartificialprocess,cloningis"playingGod",tryingtoreplacetheprocesscreatedbyGodwithoneofourowninvention.●Somenumberofbabies--embryos,ifyouprefer--createdbycloningwilldiebecauseoftechnicalproblemsintheprocess,andmorewillbekilleddeliberatelybecausetheyareimperfect.Thus,cloningwillinevitablyresultinthedeathofinnocentbabies.■TalkingaboutcloningWorkinpairstodiscusscloningaccordingtotheideasyoureadjustnow.CloningforpartsA:Whatisyouropinionaboutcloningforparts?B:Icertainlyagreethatitiswrongtokillsomeonesothatyoucan"harvest"hisbodyparts,whetherthatpersonisanadult,achild,oranembryo.C:Sowillyoujoinwithanyonewhocondemnsusingaclonedhumanbeingasapieceofproperty.用心爱心专心B:Yes,Iwill.A:But...peoplecanandhavetreatedothersasproperty--wecallit"slavery"--formillenia,andtodatenoneofthesevictimshavebeencloned.C:Ithinktreatingpeopleaspropertyandkillingthemforyourconvenienceareterribleevils,butthesethingshappenedbeforeanybodythoughtofcloning,andtheywill,sadlybutsurely,continuetohappenwhethercloningbecomesarealityornot.B:StillIamstronglyagainstcloningforpartsfortreatment.C:Cloningisnotacceptabletome.B:Isupposeifhundredsorthousandsofclonesofthesamepersonwerecreated,thiscouldbecomeabiggerissue.A:Thenwhyclone?C:Sowhatarethebenefits?Whycreateacloneanyway?B:Iamhardpressedtothinkofagoodreasontosupportcloning.A:Iscloningimmoralinprinciple?B:Isayno.C:Iscloningimmoral,asitisbeingpursuedtoday?B:Forthemostpart,Isayyes.Mostofthereasonsgivenareimmoralorunwise.D:Aretheremoralapplicationsofcloning?B:Probably,butI'mhardpressedtonameanyclearlybeneficialapplications.A:Ismoreresearchagoodidea?B:Sure,almostalways.Ihastentoadd,aslongasitispursuedinamoral,ethicalmanner.■WritingaparagraphaboutcloningAreyoufororagainsthumancloning?Nowwriteashortparagraphtogiveyourreasonsfororagainsthumancloning.MyReasonstoBanAllHumanCloningCloningendangerswomen.Researchcloningrequirestheharvestingofmillionsofeggsfromwomen.Theeggharvestingprocessisharmfultowomen.Womenwouldbeplacedatahigherriskforvariouskindsofcancers,andotherhealthillnesses.Eggharvestingalsoexploitswomenbytreatingthemasmereegg-makingmachines,andcreatingamassivemarketforeggsandeggdonorsthatwouldtakeadvantageofpoor,disadvantagedwomen.Researchcloningisunnecessaryformedicalprogress.Althoughcloningscientistssaythatcloningresearchwillleadtomiraclecures,notasinglepatientiscurrentlybeingtreatedusingsuchresearch.Onlyabanonallcloningiseffective.Inmyopinionitwouldbealmostimpossibletoputastoponlyonreproductivecloning.Ifclonedhumanembryoscanbeproducedinlabs,therewouldbenowaytomakesuretheywerenotputinwomenandbroughttobirth.Fundingresearchcloningisirresponsible.Thereislimitedmoneyforresearch.Themoneyforresearchshouldnotbewastedoncloning.Thereisfarmoreimportantresearchthatneedsmoney.Reproductivecloningdamagesthefamily.Ithinkreproductivecloningwouldconfusefamilyrelationships.Aclonedchildwouldhaveonly用心爱心专心oneparent.Wouldtheclonebetheperson'schildorsibling?Cloningcouldmeanmorechildrenwouldgrowupinsingle-parentfamily,withoutthebenefitofmarriedparents.Weneedgoodscience.Businessandscience,likeeveryotherhumaneffort,mustbegoodinnature.Iamforbanningallcloning.Idon’tliketoseethecloningofhumanbeings.Mostcountriesopposeallhumancloning.Isupportabanonbothreproductiveandresearchcloning.Manycountriesandinternationalorganizations,includingGermany,Switzerland,andChina,havebannedallhumancloning.用心爱心专心
