国贸实务-案例分析-Case-StudiesVIP免费

CaseStudiesofInternationalTradeCourse:PracticeofInternationalTradeAdviser:GaoYanfengGrade&Class:Grade2012Class5Name:LiYuanbaoStudentID:120440502Date:20thDecember,20141CaseStudiesofInternationalTradeName:LiYuanbaoStudentID:120440502Case1QualityofGoodsAChineseexportersignedasalescontractwithaEuropeancompanytoexportfivemetrictonsofChinesedates.BoththecontractandtheL/CspecifiedthatthedateswereofGrade3.Whenpreparinggoodsforshipment,thesellerfoundthatGrade3Chinesedateswereoutofstock.Inordertomakedeliveryintime,thesellershippedtheGrade2ChinesedatestothebuyerandindicatedinthecommercialinvoicethattheGrade2ChinesedatesarepricedasperGrade3.Doyouthinkitisreasonablefortheexportertodoso?Whatkindofriskistherefortheseller?译文：一家中国出口商与一家欧洲出口商签订了一个合同，卖方向买方出口5公吨的红枣。合同与信用证上明确标注，卖方所提供的是三等的红枣。当准备货物装运时，卖方发现三等红枣的仓储存货不足。为了使货物按时到达，卖方将二等红枣配送到给买方，并在商务发票上注明二等红枣的价格与三等红枣一致。你认为出口方这么做是否合理。卖方这样做有何风险？AnalysisonCase1:AccordingtoUCP500,Article37,thedescriptionofgoodsinthecommercialinvoicesmustcorrespondwiththedescriptionintheCredit.WhatthesellerdidisinconsistentwiththestipulationofUCP.ThebuyerisentitledtorejectthepaymentandthegoodsonthegroundthatthegoodsdeliveredarenotwhatthecontractandL/Crequire.2Ifthemarketchangesorthepricefallsdown,thebuyermaytakethisexcuseforrejectingthegoodsorclaimingcompensationfromtheseller,thoughtthegoodsdeliveredarebetterthanthosestipulatedinthecontract.Case2QuantityofGoodsAChineseexportcompanyexported1000electricfanstoacountryintheMiddleEast.BoththecontractandL/Cstipulatedthatpartialshipmentwasnotallowed.Whenthefansweretransportedtotheportforshipment,itwasfoundthat40fansweredamagedanditwasimpossibletoreplacethedefectivefansbecauseofthetimefortheshipment.TheconsignorthoughtthataccordingtoUCP5005%moreorlesswasallowediftheamountdidn’texceedtheL/Camountandunder-delivering40fanswasstillwithin5%.Intheend,960fansweredeliveredtotheimporter.Whenthesellersurrenderedtheshippingdocumentstothebankforthenegotiationofpayment,hewasrejectedbythebank.Wasitreasonableforthebanktodoso?译文：一家中国出口公司向位于中东的一个国家出口1000台电风扇。合同与信用证上都规定了不允许分批运装。当这批风扇被运送到港口进行装运的时候，发现有40台电风扇有损坏，但由于装运的时间限制，所以无法对残次的风扇进行更换。发货方认为，根据UCP5005%溢短装条款，如果货物（电风扇）的数量不超过信用证上的数量或者少于40台以内的数量，都是在5%的范围内的。最终，960台风扇被运送到了进口方。当卖方向银行提交船运文件以商讨款项支付时，银行拒绝了这一请求。银行这么做合理吗？3AnalysisonCase2:AccordingtoUCP500,Article39,unlessaCreditstipulatesthatthequantityofthegoodsspecifiedmustnotbeexceededorreduced,atoleranceof5%moreor5%lesswillbepermissible,alwaysprovidedthattheamountofthedrawingsdoesnotexceedtheamountoftheCredit.ThistolerancedoesnotapplywhentheCreditstipulatesthequantityintermsofastatednumberofpackingunitsorindividualitems.Itcanbeseenthatthequantityoffansiscalculatedbynumber.Thesellerisnotallowedtounder-deliver40fans.Instead,hemustdeliverthefullquantitystipulatedintheL/C.Sothebankwasreasonabletorejectthenegotiation.Case3PackingofCommodityAChineseimporterpurchasedsomeflammableliquidchemicalrawmaterialfromaFrenchexporter.Whentheshipmentarrivedatthedestination,itwasfoundthattherewasaslightl...