电脑桌面
添加小米粒文库到电脑桌面
安装后可以在桌面快捷访问

国贸实务-案例分析-Case-StudiesVIP免费

国贸实务-案例分析-Case-Studies_第1页
1/10
国贸实务-案例分析-Case-Studies_第2页
2/10
国贸实务-案例分析-Case-Studies_第3页
3/10
CaseStudiesofInternationalTradeCourse:PracticeofInternationalTradeAdviser:GaoYanfengGrade&Class:Grade2012Class5Name:LiYuanbaoStudentID:120440502Date:20thDecember,20141CaseStudiesofInternationalTradeName:LiYuanbaoStudentID:120440502Case1QualityofGoodsAChineseexportersignedasalescontractwithaEuropeancompanytoexportfivemetrictonsofChinesedates.BoththecontractandtheL/CspecifiedthatthedateswereofGrade3.Whenpreparinggoodsforshipment,thesellerfoundthatGrade3Chinesedateswereoutofstock.Inordertomakedeliveryintime,thesellershippedtheGrade2ChinesedatestothebuyerandindicatedinthecommercialinvoicethattheGrade2ChinesedatesarepricedasperGrade3.Doyouthinkitisreasonablefortheexportertodoso?Whatkindofriskistherefortheseller?译文:一家中国出口商与一家欧洲出口商签订了一个合同,卖方向买方出口5公吨的红枣。合同与信用证上明确标注,卖方所提供的是三等的红枣。当准备货物装运时,卖方发现三等红枣的仓储存货不足。为了使货物按时到达,卖方将二等红枣配送到给买方,并在商务发票上注明二等红枣的价格与三等红枣一致。你认为出口方这么做是否合理。卖方这样做有何风险?AnalysisonCase1:AccordingtoUCP500,Article37,thedescriptionofgoodsinthecommercialinvoicesmustcorrespondwiththedescriptionintheCredit.WhatthesellerdidisinconsistentwiththestipulationofUCP.ThebuyerisentitledtorejectthepaymentandthegoodsonthegroundthatthegoodsdeliveredarenotwhatthecontractandL/Crequire.2Ifthemarketchangesorthepricefallsdown,thebuyermaytakethisexcuseforrejectingthegoodsorclaimingcompensationfromtheseller,thoughtthegoodsdeliveredarebetterthanthosestipulatedinthecontract.Case2QuantityofGoodsAChineseexportcompanyexported1000electricfanstoacountryintheMiddleEast.BoththecontractandL/Cstipulatedthatpartialshipmentwasnotallowed.Whenthefansweretransportedtotheportforshipment,itwasfoundthat40fansweredamagedanditwasimpossibletoreplacethedefectivefansbecauseofthetimefortheshipment.TheconsignorthoughtthataccordingtoUCP5005%moreorlesswasallowediftheamountdidn’texceedtheL/Camountandunder-delivering40fanswasstillwithin5%.Intheend,960fansweredeliveredtotheimporter.Whenthesellersurrenderedtheshippingdocumentstothebankforthenegotiationofpayment,hewasrejectedbythebank.Wasitreasonableforthebanktodoso?译文:一家中国出口公司向位于中东的一个国家出口1000台电风扇。合同与信用证上都规定了不允许分批运装。当这批风扇被运送到港口进行装运的时候,发现有40台电风扇有损坏,但由于装运的时间限制,所以无法对残次的风扇进行更换。发货方认为,根据UCP5005%溢短装条款,如果货物(电风扇)的数量不超过信用证上的数量或者少于40台以内的数量,都是在5%的范围内的。最终,960台风扇被运送到了进口方。当卖方向银行提交船运文件以商讨款项支付时,银行拒绝了这一请求。银行这么做合理吗?3AnalysisonCase2:AccordingtoUCP500,Article39,unlessaCreditstipulatesthatthequantityofthegoodsspecifiedmustnotbeexceededorreduced,atoleranceof5%moreor5%lesswillbepermissible,alwaysprovidedthattheamountofthedrawingsdoesnotexceedtheamountoftheCredit.ThistolerancedoesnotapplywhentheCreditstipulatesthequantityintermsofastatednumberofpackingunitsorindividualitems.Itcanbeseenthatthequantityoffansiscalculatedbynumber.Thesellerisnotallowedtounder-deliver40fans.Instead,hemustdeliverthefullquantitystipulatedintheL/C.Sothebankwasreasonabletorejectthenegotiation.Case3PackingofCommodityAChineseimporterpurchasedsomeflammableliquidchemicalrawmaterialfromaFrenchexporter.Whentheshipmentarrivedatthedestination,itwasfoundthattherewasaslightl...

1、当您付费下载文档后,您只拥有了使用权限,并不意味着购买了版权,文档只能用于自身使用,不得用于其他商业用途(如 [转卖]进行直接盈利或[编辑后售卖]进行间接盈利)。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。
3、如文档内容存在违规,或者侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权等,请点击“违规举报”。

碎片内容

国贸实务-案例分析-Case-Studies

您可能关注的文档

确认删除?
VIP
微信客服
  • 扫码咨询
会员Q群
  • 会员专属群点击这里加入QQ群
客服邮箱
回到顶部