Recent Transformations Administration Theory： a revolution in public management？ 近代的变革管理理论：公共管理的改革 Since the early１９８０s much work has been conducted in public administration theory and practice that claims to go beyond the conservative approach in the field．This “liberalization” of public administration is recognized today as the NPM trend．The self-identity problem of public administration was greatly aggravated by the launching of the idea of NPM．As noted by Kettl and Mitward， “public management is neither traditional public administration nor policy analysis since it borrows heavily from a variety of disciplines and methodological approaches．”Mainly drawing on the experience of the business／industrial／private sector，scholars have suggested taking a more demanding attitude to the dynamics， activity， and productivity of public organizations： however， “competing academic disciplines dueled to establish bridgeheads or，worse ，virtually ignored each other as they developed parallel tracks on related problems”．Consequently， a cross-fertilization， which could have accelerated learning and improved performance of public systems，was delayed． 自20 世纪80 年代初以来，很多工作都已经在公共行政理论和实践中开展，主张要超越公共行政领域的保守研究方法。这种“自由主义化”的公共行政在今天被认为是新公共管理的发展趋势。公共行政的认同问题大大促进了新公共管理理念的产生。正如凯特尔和米尔瓦德所提到的：“公共管理既不是传统的公共行政，也不是政策分析，因为它大量地借用了不同的学科和方法论的方法。”主要吸收和借鉴了商业、工业和私营部门的经验，学者们建议在公共组织的动力、活动和生产效率上采取更高的要求：然而，“相互竞争的学术科目争抢去建立优势地位，更槽糕的是，他们在相关问题上各行其是地发展，几乎忽略了彼此。”因此，一个可以促进学术交流和提高公共系统绩效的跨领域合作，被延迟了。 What are the roots ...
