精品文档---下载后可任意编辑三种外固定治疗桡骨远端伸直型骨折的疗效对比的开题报告【摘要】目的：比较三种外固定治疗桡骨远端伸直型骨折的疗效。方法：选取 2024 年 1 月至 2024 年 12 月我院收治的 126 例桡骨远端伸直型骨折患者，根据治疗方法分为三组：A 组采纳半腕外固定，B组采纳茎突下外固定，C 组采纳桡、尺、掌骨外固定。记录患者术后痛苦缓解时间、功能恢复时间、并发症发生率及疗效。结果：A 组术后痛苦缓解时间、功能恢复时间比 B、C 组明显缩短，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。B 组并发症发生率最高，C 组次之，A组最低，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：三种外固定治疗桡骨远端伸直型骨折均可达到良好的疗效，但半腕外固定具有痛苦缓解时间、功能恢复时间短、并发症发生率低等优势，值得临床推广应用。【关键词】桡骨远端伸直型骨折，外固定，疗效，比较【Abstract】Objective: To compare the efficacy of three types of external fixation for the treatment of distal radius fracture with extension type.Methods: A total of 126 patients with distal radius fracture with extension type admitted to our hospital from January 2024 to December 2024 were selected and divided into three groups according to the treatment methods: group A was treated with half wrist external fixation, group B was treated with distal metaphyseal external fixation, and group C was treated with radial, ulnar and carpal bone external fixation. The time of pain relief after operation, the time of functional recovery, the incidence of complications and the efficacy were recorded.Results: The time of pain relief and functional recovery after operation in group A were significantly shorter than those in groups B and C, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of complications was 精品文档---下载后可任意编辑highest in group B, followed by group C, and lowest in group A, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion: Three types of external fixation can achieve good efficacy in the treatment of distal radius fracture with extension type, but half wrist external fixation has the advantages of short time of pain relief, short time of functional recovery, and low incidence of complications, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.【Keywords】Distal radius fracture with extension type, external fixation, efficacy, comparison
