“以营利为目的”与肖像权侵权责任认定

1 “以营利为目的”与肖像权侵权责任认定摘 要在我国近几年的肖像权侵权案件中，侵害肖像权的加害行为如何认定的问题一直困扰着当事人双方及法官。而其中尤以，是否“以营利为目的”来作为判案标准被长期争论。尽管法律中明确规定了肖像权侵权责任认定主要以是否是营利性质来作为判定依据。但是许多学者并不认同此观点。本文依据多方面论证，以事实为依据，多角度分析原因，理论联系实际这一思路进行展开论述。首先阐述相关概念，从理论角度明确区分不同名词所表达的不同含义。继而从宪法精神、生活习惯以及法律领域三个层面看待“将‘以营利为目的’作为肖像权侵权责任构成要件”的不合理、不合适、不科学性，并以此来证明不应该将“以营利为目的”作为肖像权侵权责任构成要件。最后简述了“以营利为目的”界定肖像权侵权责任大小的依据。充分论述了“以营利为目的”作为肖像权侵权责任构成要件的不合理性。关键词 肖像权；侵权责任；以营利为目的；责任认定2 "For-profit" and image right infringementresponsibility identificationAbstractIn our image rights infringement cases in recent years , how infringement of portrait rights recognized harm behavior has been plagued by both parties and the judge. And especially in , whether " for profit " as the judgment criteria are long debate . Although the law clearly states the portrait tort liability if it is found mainly in the nature of a judgment -profit basis . But many scholars do not agree with this view.In this paper, based on various arguments , fact-based , multi-angle analysis of the reasons , theory and practice are expanded on this idea are discussed . First elaborated concepts , from a theoretical point of view clearly distinguish different meanings expressed in different terms . Then look at " the ' for-profit ' image rights as constituent elements of tort liability ," the spirit of the Constitution from unreasonable , habits and areas of law three levels , inappropriate , unscientific , and in order to prove ...