AbstractEscape Behavior of Causing Traffic Accidents has becoming more and more common in modern society. This kind of behavior initiated a quite harmfulness influence among the public，so it’s urgent to call for law restraint.It’s definitely not an advisable choice for the trouble- maker escape after causing a traffic accident. Because if doing so, not only have a tremendous social dangerousness but also violating the legal rights and interests of other traffic participants and the national traffic safety administration discipline.In article 133 of Crimes and according to the supreme-court interpretation of practical methods when goes to adjudicate traffic criminal case are set up standard to the related issue.But on the contrary, it’s a knotty problem when processing escape behavior after causing a traffic accident in judicial-practice. What’s more, there are many differences and disputes even in the criminal law theorists.The paper will focus on the following four points: First, the research value of escape behavior of causing traffic accidents. Second, the legal defects about this respect in our country. Third, the foreign legislation. Fourth, the countermeasure Study on escape behavior of causing traffic accidents.Keywords: escape behavior； the judicial determination of escape behavior；Death Caused by Escape； independent crime交 通 肇 事 逃 逸 行 为 的 探 析近 年 来 , 交 通 肇 事 逃 逸 问 题 一 直 是 我 国 刑 事 司法 和 刑 法 理 论 关 注 的 焦 点 。 修 订 后 的 《 刑 法 》 把交 通 肇 事 逃 逸 行 为 作 为 一 个 加 重 处 罚 情 节 规 定 在交 通 肇 事 罪 中, 司 法 实 践 中法 院 主 要 是 依 据 刑 法第133 条“交通肇事罪”的规定和最高院发布的《 解 释 》 来 处 理 交 通 肇...
