论南海仲裁案的管辖权问题分析研究 法学专业分析研究

论南海仲裁案的管辖权问题 [摘要]2013 年，菲律宾依据《联合国海洋法公约》的规定，单方将中菲南海争端提交海牙国际常设仲裁法院，后者依据《联合国海洋法公约》附件七组建仲裁庭进行仲裁并于 2016 年作出裁决。仲裁庭在行使管辖权上违背了属事管辖原则、当事人自愿选择程序优先原则和当事方有权排除强制管辖原则，因此仲裁庭的管辖权属值质疑。中国应在注重和平方式解决争端、思虑加入司法程序、总结加入《联合国海洋法公约》的成败和加强海洋意识的教育方面来应对今后类似的案件。[关键词]南海仲裁案；管辖权；海洋划界争端[Abstract]In 2013,according to the provisions of the United Nations convention on the law of the sea in the sea in the Philippines, one will be in the Philippines in the south China sea dispute submitted to the international arbitration court in the Hague, the latter according to the United Nations convention on the law of the seven form attachments for arbitration and the arbitration tribunal ruled in 2016.Arbitration tribunal on the exercise of jurisdiction in violation of genus matter jurisdiction, the principle of voluntary choice program and the parties shall have the right to rule out compulsory jurisdiction, so the arbitration tribunal shall be under the jurisdiction of the ownership value. China should be pay attention to solve the dispute in a peaceful way and though to join the judicial process, sums up to join the United Nations convention on the law of success or failure and strengthen the awareness of education has to deal with similar cases in the future.[Key words]The south China sea to arbitration; jurisdiction; maritime delimitation dispute中国与菲律宾于 2012 年就中沙群岛的黄岩岛的相关主权问题和海洋权益问题发生纠纷后，菲律宾向位于荷兰海牙的常设仲裁法院（Permanent Court of Arbitration,简称 PCA）申请提起仲裁。经历过长达 5 年的时间后，仲裁庭于 2016 年 7 月 12 日公布了 “最终裁决”。该...