电脑桌面
添加小米粒文库到电脑桌面
安装后可以在桌面快捷访问

论复议机关作共同被告制度分析研究 法学专业

论复议机关作共同被告制度分析研究 法学专业_第1页
1/8
论复议机关作共同被告制度分析研究 法学专业_第2页
2/8
论复议机关作共同被告制度分析研究 法学专业_第3页
3/8
论复议机关作共同被告制度[摘 要]长期以来,复议机关为了避免成为被告倾向于作出复议维持决定,严重影响了行政复议功能的发挥。新《行政诉讼法》中规定的复议机关作共同被告制度就是针对这一现象而出台的解决方案。复议机关作共同被告制度对于复议机关复议权力的行使以及行政纠纷的高效解决有着重要的意义,但由于复议案件的复杂性,在实践中出现了案件数量急剧上升影响复议工作、复议不作为泛滥、级别管辖错位、审查对象不明确的问题,本文通过分析这些问题,提出设立专门应诉队伍、加强对复议不作为的监督、适当提高级别管辖和明确审查对象的建议。[关键词]复议机关;共同被告;级别管辖 ;审查对象 [Abstract] For a long time, in order to avoid becoming a defendant, the reconsideration organ had tended to make the same decision as primary administrative organ’s on reconsideration, which had seriously affected the function of the administrative reexamination. In the new administrative procedure law, the reconsideration organ has to become the codefendant with the primary administrative organ, which is the effective solution to this phenomenon. The system of reconsideration organ being the codefendant has a great significance for settling administrative dispute efficiently and exercising the power of administrative reexamination. Due to the complexity of reconsideration cases, there are some problems in practice, such as the number of cases rising dramatically, irresponsible for administrative reexamination, the dislocation of jurisdiction by level, ambiguous examining object. By analyzing these problems, this paper puts forward some suggestions, setting up a special investigations team, strengthening the supervision of reconsideration inaction, appropriate improvement of level of jurisdiction and clearing review object.[Key words]reconsideration organ; codefendant; jurisdiction by level; examining object新行政诉讼法改变了原来复议维持只以作出原行政...

1、当您付费下载文档后,您只拥有了使用权限,并不意味着购买了版权,文档只能用于自身使用,不得用于其他商业用途(如 [转卖]进行直接盈利或[编辑后售卖]进行间接盈利)。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。
3、如文档内容存在违规,或者侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权等,请点击“违规举报”。

碎片内容

论复议机关作共同被告制度分析研究 法学专业

您可能关注的文档

文章天下+ 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

各种文档应有尽有

确认删除?
VIP
微信客服
  • 扫码咨询
会员Q群
  • 会员专属群点击这里加入QQ群
客服邮箱
回到顶部