论公司在股东代表诉讼中的法律地位分析研究 法学专业分析研究

论公司在股东代表诉讼中的法律地位摘 要股东代表诉讼起源可以追溯于英国福斯规则中——禁止少数股东向公司提起诉讼。当公司被欺骗或被控制时，不适用于公司自治和公司独立人格；美国商业裁决通过罢免手段充分体现了对董事会的尊重，而股东代表诉讼并不是英美国家保护少数股东的主要手段。本文借鉴美国及日本股东代表诉讼制度的立法经验以及最高人民法院 2016 年 12 月 12 日原则通过的《公司法》司法解释(四)征求意见稿综合得出，我国股东代表诉讼的制度完善应当从完善原告诉讼费用缴纳制度、完善股东起诉保障制度、完善公司诉讼保障制度、简化诉讼前置程序制度以及完善举证责任分配制度等方面予以强化，最终以适应我国市场经济对于商事主体愈加宽松灵活的要求，切实保障公司的权益。关键词：股东代表诉讼；当事人适格；股东权益On the legal status of the company in the lawsuit of the shareholders' RepresentativeABSTRACTThe shareholder representative lawsuit originated from the British forth rule, which forbids minority shareholders to bring a lawsuit against the company. When the company is fraudulent and controlled, it is not applicable. It embodies respect for the autonomy of the company and the independent personality of the company. It is not the main means to protect minority shareholders in Anglo American countries. This article draws lessons from the legislative experience of the litigation system of the shareholders representative of the United States and Japan and the draft of the judicial interpretation of the company law (four) adopted by the Supreme People's Court on the December 12, 2016 principle. It is concluded that the system of shareholder representative litigation in China should be perfected by perfecting the system of paying the plaintiff's litigation expenses and perfecting the system of shareholder's prosecution guarantee. Degree, improve the company's litigation guarantee system, simplify the system of prepositional procedure an...