AbstractThe system of default judgement is universal in the world. The unique functions of default judgement can protect the legal rights of the party comprehensively and ensure the judicial proceeding runs on normally, which can also improve lawsuit efficiency. But our country civil procedure law about default judgement have some deficiencies such as violation of equal principle, infringement of litigation subject status and deficiency of judicial relief measure, which leads to not properly protect the litigation rights of the party in judicial practice. This article analyses the deficiencies combining overseas legislation and our country the actual, in which propose the reform concrete tentative plan: either plaintiff or defendant defaulted can use default judgement, the party have the right to start the proceeding of default judgement, different absent reason has different judicial relief measure.Key words: civil procedure；default judgement； mode of judgement by Ex-parte debate ；mode of judgement by default试论我国民事诉讼缺席判决制度的完善缺席判决制度是一项重要的民事诉讼制度，早在古罗马时期就形成了它的雏形。所谓缺席判决，是与对席判决相对而言的，具体是指在某一方当事人无正当理由而拒不到庭或者未经法庭许可中途退庭的情况下，受诉人民法院经过开庭审理后，依法对案件所作出的判决。缺席判决制度在保护公民的合法权益、提高诉讼效率、保障民事审判权的正确行使等方面，都有重要作用。缺席判决制度的最终目的在于鼓舞当事人积极参加诉讼，完成各种诉讼行为，尽量减少缺席情形的发生；在相对意义上尽可能维护当事人的平等地位，为当事人在诉讼中攻守平衡的机会和手段提供充分保障。一、完善我国民事诉讼缺席判决制度的意义（一）完善我国民事诉讼缺席判决制度的立法意义缺席判决制度是民事诉讼法的重要组成部分，一个国家缺席判决制度的设置情况，在一定程度上反映了该国的诉讼模式和诉讼价值取向。作为民事诉讼的一部分，完善缺席判决制度的意义在于实现民事诉讼的目的，具体而...
