电脑桌面
添加小米粒文库到电脑桌面
安装后可以在桌面快捷访问

2013届高考英语维“升”素7-环境保护(阅读理解)VIP免费

2013届高考英语维“升”素7-环境保护(阅读理解)_第1页
1/9
2013届高考英语维“升”素7-环境保护(阅读理解)_第2页
2/9
2013届高考英语维“升”素7-环境保护(阅读理解)_第3页
3/9
高考维“升”素7——环境保护(时间:30分钟分值:56分)维A阅读理解(每题2分,满分8分)(2012·北京卷)Wilderness“Inwilderness(荒野)isthepreservationoftheworld.”Thisisafamoussayingfromawriterregardedasoneofthefathersofenvironmentalism.Thefrequencywithwhichitisborrowedmirrorsaheateddebateonenvironmentalprotection:whethertoplacewildernessattheheartofwhatistobepreserved.AsJohnSauvenofGreenpeaceUKpointsout,thereisastrongappealinimagesofthewild,theuntouched;morethananythingelse,theyspeakofthenaturethatmanypeoplevaluemostdearly.Theurgetoleavethesubjectofsuchimagesuntouchedisstrong,andthedangerexploitation(开发)bringstosuchlandscapes(景观)isreal.Someofthesewildernessesalsoperformfunctionsthathumansneed—therainforests,forexample,storecarboninvastquantities.ToMr.Sauven,these“ecosystemservices”faroutweighthegainsfromexploitation.LeeLane,avisitingfellowattheHudsonInstitute,takestheopposingview.Heacknowledgesthatwildernessesdoprovideusefulservices,suchaswaterconservation.Butthatisnot,heargues,areasontoavoidallhumanpresence,orindeedcommercialandindustrialexploitation.ThereareevermorepeopleontheEarth,andtheyreasonablyandrightfullywanttohavebetterlives,ratherthanmerelystruggleforsurvival.Whilethewaysofusingresourceshaveimproved,thereisstillagrowingneedforrawmaterials,andsomewildernessescontaintheminabundance.Iftheycanbetappedwithoutreducingtheservicesthosewildernessesprovide,theargumentgoes,thereisnofurtherreasonnottodoso.Beinguntouchedisnot,initself,acharacteristicworthvaluingaboveallothers.Ilookforwardtoseeingtheseviewstakenfurther,andtotheirbeingchallengedbytheotherparticipants.Onechallengethatsuggestsitselftomeisthatbothcasesneedtotakeonthequestionofspiritualvaluealittlemoredirectly.Andthereisapracticalquestionastowhetherwildernessescanbeexploitedwithoutharm.Thisisatopicthatcallsfornotonlyfreeexpressionoffeelings,butalsotheguidanceofreason.Whatpositionwildernessshouldenjoyinthepreservationoftheworldobviouslydeservesmuchmoreseriousthinking.【语篇解读】荒野是否应该开发?仁者见仁,智者见智,两种观点针锋相对,莫衷一是。作者客观分析,冷静思考,期待着事态的发展。1.JohnSauvenholdsthat________.A.manypeoplevaluenaturetoomuch1B.exploitationofwildernessesisharmfulC.wildernessesprovidehumanswithnecessitiesD.theurgetodeveloptheecosystemservicesisstrong答案B[考查推理判断。第二段的最后一句提到JohnSauven认为“生态系统服务”远比开发的利益重要,由此可推断他的观点是开发荒野有害。]2.WhatisthemainideaofPara.3?A.Theexploitationisnecessaryforthepoorpeople.B.Wildernessescannotguaranteebetteruseofrawmaterials.C.Usefulservicesofwildernessesarenotthereasonfornoexploitation.D.Allthecharacteristicsconcerningtheexploitationshouldbetreatedequally.答案C[考查主旨大意。本段第二、三句是对另外一种观点的概括,意思是荒野的有益服务不能作为不开发的理由。]3.Whatistheauthor'sattitudetowardsthisdebate?A.Objective.B.Disapproving.C.Sceptical.D.Optimistic.答案A[考查推理判断。作者在最后两段中并没有直接表明自己的观点,只是“客观”地进行叙述。]4.Whichofthefollowingshowsthestructureofthepassage?CP:CentralPointP:PointSp:Subpoint(次要点)C:Conclusion答案D[考查推理判断。文章第一段提出中心论点;第二、三两段分别阐述了两种不同的观点;第四段是作者自己的观点;最后一段是文章的结论。]维B完形填空(每题1.5分,满分30分)选材网站:www.cnilt.com/topic高考曾用材料:2012天津卷完形填空选材相似度:★★★★设...

1、当您付费下载文档后,您只拥有了使用权限,并不意味着购买了版权,文档只能用于自身使用,不得用于其他商业用途(如 [转卖]进行直接盈利或[编辑后售卖]进行间接盈利)。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。
3、如文档内容存在违规,或者侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权等,请点击“违规举报”。

碎片内容

2013届高考英语维“升”素7-环境保护(阅读理解)

您可能关注的文档

确认删除?
VIP
微信客服
  • 扫码咨询
会员Q群
  • 会员专属群点击这里加入QQ群
客服邮箱
回到顶部