摘要我国市场经济一直在持续飞速地前进，交通设施的发展变化也非常迅速，各种车辆如雨后春笋般涌现，汽车也渐渐成为大家的代步工具，只是大量的交通惨案也逐渐涌现，造成的不良影响也越来越大，这种严重的社会现象逐渐形成后，已经引起了整个社会的密切关心。这样一来，一些本来有生存机会的人会因不能立刻被抢救而死亡。为了维护被害人的生命权或者财产权，也为了能够更加有效地究查行为人的刑事责任，1997年刑法在1979年刑法的基础上又增加了“因逃逸致人死亡”这种结果加重犯的规定。随后，一些相应的司法解释也逐渐出台，为司法实务作出进一步的规范与指导。尽管立法与司法解释方面有了理论上的进步，可是司法实践中仍存在很多争议。为了切实保护相关当事人的切身利益，也为了案件能够得到公平公正地处理，司法机关必须弄清楚交通肇事罪“因逃逸致人死亡”的内涵与不作为故意杀人罪的内涵，两者之间的区别与定罪边界也必须被弄清楚，本文通过最高人民法院公布的刑事指导第220号案例，对二者进行了学理分析并作出对比。本文分成五个部分：第一部分是案情介绍与案件争议的核心焦点；第二部分则阐述了对“因逃逸致人死亡”四种不同的理解，及相应的学理分析和本文自己的理解；第三部分是不作为故意杀人罪的学理分析；第四部分主要是明确区分“因逃逸致人死亡”与不作为故意杀人罪，阐述两者的相同之处与差异；第五部分是案例分析与结论，倪某的行为构成交通肇事罪，且具有交通肇事后逃逸的加重情节，其行为不符合不作为故意杀人罪的构成要件。关键词：交通肇事；逃逸致人死亡；故意杀人AbstractWiththerapidandcontinuingdevelopmentofChinesemarketeconomy,theconstructionoftrafficinfrastructureisdevelopingrapidly,withallkindsofvehiclesincreasing.Carshavebecomecommongoodsineachfamily.Buttrafficaccidentcasesemergeinanendlessstream,whichhasbecomeaserioussocialproblem,arousingwidespreadconcerninsociety.What’sworse,somepeace-breakers,inordertoavoidpenalty,evendroveawayaftertheaccident.Somanyvictimswhocouldhavesurviveddiedduetolackoftimelyrescue.Inordertoprotectthevictimsandfurtherrelatedresponsibilitieseffectively,thecriminallawof1997hasaddedtheaggravatingpunishmentoftrafficoffencesbasedonthecriminallawin1979.Anexplanationhasmadeexplanation,tofurtherregulatethetrafficaccidentcrime.Butthere’sstillalotofcontroversyinthejudicialpractice.Inordertocorrectlyhandletheescapeaftertrafficaccidentandtellthedifferencebetweendeathcausedbyhit-and-runandintentionalhomicide,thisarticle,fromtheanalysisonthenatureandtheconstitutiverequirements,makesacomparison,respectivelyindeathcausedbyhit-and-runandintentionalhomicide,basedonthe220thcriminalguidecaseannouncedbytheSupremePeople'sCourt.Theentireltextconsistsoffiveparts:firstcomesthebriefintroductionoftheguidecaseandthefocusofthecontroversy;thesecondpartistheoreticalanalysisofthedeathcausedbyhit-and-run,listingfourkindsofdifferentunderstandingandgivingopinionsofeachofthem;thethirdpartistheoreticalanalysisofintentionalhomicide;thefourthpartisthesimilaritiesofdeathcausedbyhit-and-runandintentionalhomicide,anddifferencesbetweenthem;thefifthpartistheconclusion.Throughtheabovelegalanalysis,thedefendant'sbehaviorconstitutesthecrimeoftrafficaccident,andhasaggravatedthesituationafterthetrafficaccident,notconstitutingintentionalhomicide.Keywords:Trafficaccident;deathcausedbyhit-and-run;intentionalhomicide目录一、案情介绍与案件争议焦点.......................................2（一）案情介绍..................................................................................................................2（二）案件争议焦点...........................................................
