纸质书和电子书辩论自由辩部分VIP免费

1/6电子书主要论据1、获取资源的过程方便快捷，容量大，资源丰富。theabundantresourceguaranteeaconvenientaccesstogettherightresourcewerightneed.Comparingwithtraditionalbooks,ebooksdownloadanduploadinformationonlinethatmakeiteasiertofindcurrenttimeinformation.2、节省资源，保护森林：ebookscansavemoneyandprotectforest.ebookscandramaticallyreducetheconsumeofpaperandpreventwastingresource.Soweholdtheviewthatebooksarebetterthanpaperbooks.3、节省空间，便于携带。Ebooksareconvenienttotakeandtheycansavespace.Comparingwithheavypaperbooks,ebookscanbereadeverywhereandanytime，andyouwon’tbetired.4、更加时尚个性化。Ebooksarefashionableandpersonalized.It’spopulartoreadebooks,withcellphone,pocketcomputerorMP5,maybeonthebus,intheoffice.Wecansetbackgroundandmodeonthesoftwareforreading.Sowearefirmlybelievedthatebooksarebetterthanpaperbooks.一辨Honorablejudges,distinguishedguests,ladiesandgentlemen,Iamgladtostandheretosayouropinionswhicharethatebooksarebetterthanpaper2/6books.+定义，限制在20词内Hereareourmainreasons:Firstly,ebookshaveabundantresourceanditisconvenienttosearch.Secondly,ebookscansavemoneyandprotectforest.ebookscanreducetheuseofpaper,avoidthewasteofresources.Thirdly,ebooksareconvenienttotakeandtheycansavespaceComparedwithheavypaperbooks,e-bookscanbereadatanytimeandanyplace.Finally,ebooksarefashionableandpersonalized.Itisbecomingalifestyle.So,wearefirmlybelievedthatebooksarebetterthanpaperbooks.自由辩：性价比高Ebookshavehighqualityandreasonableprice,wecanhavealibrarybyamobiledevice.Itismuchmorecheaperthanpaperbooks.I’dliketosay,couldyouaffordalibrary?对方回答并反问电子书不够普及，学生上课都用纸质书？我方数据阐释。我方反问：纸质书难道不是对木材的浪费吗？I'mafraidyouarewrong.AccordingtothefourthreadinginvestigationmadebyChineseinstituteofpublishingscience,traditionalreadingratecontinuedtodeclineforsixyears,andtheamountofpeoplereadingebooksis7.5timesmorethanbefore.Anotherpointisthatthewastetoforest.Eachnewbookcanbeonlymadebywood,recyclecan’tsolvetheproblemscompletely.well⋯whatdoyou3/6think?对方回答并反问：电子污染，重金属污染如何解决。我方回答：提到电子设备的污染问题，对方辩友难道因为污染而不用手机吗，会因为污染而不打电子游戏吗？与打dota想比，看电子书不是更有意义吗？Whenitcomestopollution,Iwanttosay,canyougiveupplayingyourmobilephonebecauseofpollution?Canyoupromisenottoplaycomputertoprotectourenvironment?Isn’titmoremeaningfultoreadebookscomparingwithplayingdota?对方拿道具举例，绿茶和冰红茶，感觉问题，文化气息。我方回答：我们读的是内容，看的是文字，与借助的载体无关。Wethink,wereadthecontent,seetheword,ithasnothingtodowithcarrier.Aswewanttodrinkwater,isitaveryimportantquestiontouseabowltodrinkoracuptodrink?对方反问：电子书主要是网络小说等等，没营养。我方回答：名著都会有电子版。反问对方搜资料问题Famousbooksalsohaveelectroniceditions.Ifyouwanttoread,youareboundtofindit.Iwanttoaskmyfellowdebaters,don’tyousearchinformationsfromtheInternet?Never?Aren’tthereanyusefulinformation?Really?Don’tyouseeksomethingaboutdebatebeforeclass?对方拿吉米和平板电脑做对比，反问说看电子书容易不专注。我方回答：这是你的个人问题，不涉及电子书的优劣。4/6Ithinkitisyourpersonalproblems,whatyousaidistoofarfromourtopic.Ifyouaska学霸toreadebooks,healsocanreadpatiently.Iagreethatelectronicdeviceshavesomedisadvantages,butithasnoconnectionwithebooks.对方反问眼睛损伤，视力下降我方回答：损坏视力跟用眼习惯有关。看纸质...