1/6电子书主要论据1、获取资源的过程方便快捷,容量大,资源丰富。theabundantresourceguaranteeaconvenientaccesstogettherightresourcewerightneed.Comparingwithtraditionalbooks,ebooksdownloadanduploadinformationonlinethatmakeiteasiertofindcurrenttimeinformation.2、节省资源,保护森林:ebookscansavemoneyandprotectforest.ebookscandramaticallyreducetheconsumeofpaperandpreventwastingresource.Soweholdtheviewthatebooksarebetterthanpaperbooks.3、节省空间,便于携带。Ebooksareconvenienttotakeandtheycansavespace.Comparingwithheavypaperbooks,ebookscanbereadeverywhereandanytime,andyouwon’tbetired.4、更加时尚个性化。Ebooksarefashionableandpersonalized.It’spopulartoreadebooks,withcellphone,pocketcomputerorMP5,maybeonthebus,intheoffice.Wecansetbackgroundandmodeonthesoftwareforreading.Sowearefirmlybelievedthatebooksarebetterthanpaperbooks.一辨Honorablejudges,distinguishedguests,ladiesandgentlemen,Iamgladtostandheretosayouropinionswhicharethatebooksarebetterthanpaper2/6books.+定义,限制在20词内Hereareourmainreasons:Firstly,ebookshaveabundantresourceanditisconvenienttosearch.Secondly,ebookscansavemoneyandprotectforest.ebookscanreducetheuseofpaper,avoidthewasteofresources.Thirdly,ebooksareconvenienttotakeandtheycansavespaceComparedwithheavypaperbooks,e-bookscanbereadatanytimeandanyplace.Finally,ebooksarefashionableandpersonalized.Itisbecomingalifestyle.So,wearefirmlybelievedthatebooksarebetterthanpaperbooks.自由辩:性价比高Ebookshavehighqualityandreasonableprice,wecanhavealibrarybyamobiledevice.Itismuchmorecheaperthanpaperbooks.I’dliketosay,couldyouaffordalibrary?对方回答并反问电子书不够普及,学生上课都用纸质书?我方数据阐释。我方反问:纸质书难道不是对木材的浪费吗?I'mafraidyouarewrong.AccordingtothefourthreadinginvestigationmadebyChineseinstituteofpublishingscience,traditionalreadingratecontinuedtodeclineforsixyears,andtheamountofpeoplereadingebooksis7.5timesmorethanbefore.Anotherpointisthatthewastetoforest.Eachnewbookcanbeonlymadebywood,recyclecan’tsolvetheproblemscompletely.well⋯whatdoyou3/6think?对方回答并反问:电子污染,重金属污染如何解决。我方回答:提到电子设备的污染问题,对方辩友难道因为污染而不用手机吗,会因为污染而不打电子游戏吗?与打dota想比,看电子书不是更有意义吗?Whenitcomestopollution,Iwanttosay,canyougiveupplayingyourmobilephonebecauseofpollution?Canyoupromisenottoplaycomputertoprotectourenvironment?Isn’titmoremeaningfultoreadebookscomparingwithplayingdota?对方拿道具举例,绿茶和冰红茶,感觉问题,文化气息。我方回答:我们读的是内容,看的是文字,与借助的载体无关。Wethink,wereadthecontent,seetheword,ithasnothingtodowithcarrier.Aswewanttodrinkwater,isitaveryimportantquestiontouseabowltodrinkoracuptodrink?对方反问:电子书主要是网络小说等等,没营养。我方回答:名著都会有电子版。反问对方搜资料问题Famousbooksalsohaveelectroniceditions.Ifyouwanttoread,youareboundtofindit.Iwanttoaskmyfellowdebaters,don’tyousearchinformationsfromtheInternet?Never?Aren’tthereanyusefulinformation?Really?Don’tyouseeksomethingaboutdebatebeforeclass?对方拿吉米和平板电脑做对比,反问说看电子书容易不专注。我方回答:这是你的个人问题,不涉及电子书的优劣。4/6Ithinkitisyourpersonalproblems,whatyousaidistoofarfromourtopic.Ifyouaska学霸toreadebooks,healsocanreadpatiently.Iagreethatelectronicdeviceshavesomedisadvantages,butithasnoconnectionwithebooks.对方反问眼睛损伤,视力下降我方回答:损坏视力跟用眼习惯有关。看纸质...