AbstractCivil standard of proof is a measure for the judge become inner conviction. The civil standard of objective reality is too single,and it's difficult to achieve in the judicial practice. The civil standard of objective fact had no longer meet the complex litigation to prove our activities and more suited the needs of the civil trial, establishment of a new standard of proof is very important and urgent.In this paper, I compare and analysis the probability standar of proof of two legal systems, investigate the formulation and theory of the two legal systems on the civil standard of proof, and the reference for the construction of our civil standard of proof,formulate the high degree of probability standard of proof,which meet the characteristics of the times of Civil Procedure.Key words: civil standard of proof;objective reality;high probability 论民事诉讼的证明标准证明标准在民事诉讼证明过程中具有重要的意义,它是诉讼证明活动的方向和准绳,指导者当事人和事实认定者实施正确的诉讼行为。对于案件事实能够证明到什么程度,或者说达到证明标准的事实的性质是什么或者应当是什么,国内外在学理上有不同的理论观点,而我国对于证明标准的立法只体现在原则性规定或者立法指导思想上,缺乏具体明确的法律条文规定,给司法实践带来诸多不便,严重阻碍了司法的效率与公正。因此,重新建构符合时代进展的证明标准十分紧要。一、民事诉讼证明标准在司法实践中的价值(一)保障行使诉权和防止滥诉在民事诉讼中,必须有一个统一的标准来指导裁判者对事实进行认定,并以此来审查和检验裁判者对事实的认定是否准确。假如没有统一的标准,假如允许每个人根据自己的标准对证明结果进行推断,就会出现非常荒谬的结果。法治国家尊重和保障人们的诉权,为人们提起诉讼提供必要的便利,但同时也要求人们正当地、有节制地行使自己的诉权,反对滥诉。当民事权利受到侵犯或发生争议时,证明标准是影响当事人是否选择诉讼的主要因素之一。在民事诉讼中,举证责任是根据当事人是主张权利的一方还是否认权利的一方进行分配的,与担当...