论无独立请求权第三人的权利保障分析研究 法学管理专业

摘 要随着现代社会经济交往的复杂化以及人与人之间关系的多样化，严守民事诉讼当事人主义将无法适应当代的社会经济基础，有可能导致诉讼资源浪费、诉讼迟延等损害诉讼当事人的情况发生，这些原因也促使了民事诉讼第三人制度的出现。当今，无论是司法实践还是法学理论研究领域，诉讼第三人制度的重要性都是日益显著的，但是我国现行立法对诉讼第三人制度规定过于粗略，难以应付当前复杂的民事纠纷，并无法实现诉讼公正的的诉讼制度的基本价值。因此本文将以诉讼第三人制度作为研究对象，且以无独立请求权第三人为重点进行研究。本文将通过案列分析、比较分析等方法，主要通过研究外国无独立请求权第三人制度，以求对我国无独立请求权第三人制度进行完善或重构。关键词：我国无独立请求权第三人制度重构；外国无独立请求权第三人制度；诉讼制度追求价值 AbstractIn recent years, P2P peer-to-peer lending, as a new industry of internet finance, has attracted the attention of the public in a flash. however, due to the low market access threshold, imperfect credit system, lack of government supervision and so on, the risks of the platform have been expanding, and the platform has frequently closed down or run away. It was not until 2016 that the interim measures for the management of business activities of information intermediary institutions in peer-to-peer lending were released and implemented that the status of China's P2P peer-to-peer lending platform was changed to some extent, such as unclear nature, lack of industry access rules and imperfect regulatory system. in this new situation, the concept, mode and regulatory status of P2P peer-to-peer lending platform were summarized, and the new interim measures were interpreted in combination with the development of China's P2P peer-to-peer lending platform. At the same time, through the understanding and comparison of UK and US platform supervision mode, and then put forward to improve the peer-to-peer lending...